Prediction of Nerman Fatic [352nd] vs Cengiz Aksu [794th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W W W L
Form
W L W W W L W L W LHead To Head: Fatic 1 - 0 Aksu
They have played 3 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Aksu winning 1. The last match between Fatic and Aksu was at the M25 Antalya, 23-11-2024, Second, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nerman Fatic | 1 |
| Cengiz Aksu | 0 |
| Fatic | Stats | Aksu |
|---|---|---|
| 88% (14-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 352 | Ranking | 794 |
| 191 | Highest Rank | 755 |
| 30 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 1 |
| 58% (371-271) | Career Total W/L | 53% (158-138) |
| $73,995 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Nerman Fatic
Player
Cengiz Aksu
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 10 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:10:0 | Average Match Time | 2:10:0 |
| 63% (58/92) | 1st Serve % | 68% (50/73) |
| 67% (39/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (31/50) |
| 50% (17/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (12/23) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 41% (30/73) | Return Points Win % | 39% (36/92) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nerman Fatic vs Cengiz Aksu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Aksu
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 42.01% of points on their second serve, while Aksu has won 43.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 47.15% of their opponent's second serve points, while Aksu has won 49.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.41% and 29.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 43.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Aksu has saved 55.21% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 62% of matches played (W/L 31/ 19), with Aksu winning 60% (W/L 18/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 311/ 205), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Aksu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 57/ 44), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 101/ 94).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 87.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 3), where as Aksu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.07% of matches (W/L 18/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fatic winning 1 times and Aksu being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Fatic winning 2 and Aksu winning 1. The last match between Fatic and Aksu was at the M25 Antalya, 23-11-2024, Second, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Aksu have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fatic winning 1 times and Aksu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 0, and Aksu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 269.34 while Aksu has played against players with an average rank of 152.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Aksu has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 41.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Aksu has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Nerman Fatic
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
16 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Timofey Skatov
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Sandro Kopp
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mili Poljicak
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Jan Kupcic
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Nemanja Malesevic
40%
(
4 of
10)
1st Serve %
73%
(
16 of
22)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
19
Total Points Won
13
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Ante Petar Ercegovic
48%
(
14 of
29)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
100%
(
14 of
14)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Nerman Fatic
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Giuseppe La Vela
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Cengiz Aksu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Cengiz Aksu
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Martin Van Der Meerschen
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Cengiz Aksu
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Mert Alkaya
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
43 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
110
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Cengiz Aksu
55%
(
65 of
119)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
13
Aces
7
12
Double Faults
4
78%
(
51 of
65)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
46 of
56)
48%
(
26 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
42 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Valentin Kopeikin
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
49%
(
55 of
113)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
12
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
50 of
113)
105
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Mert Naci Turker
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
62%
(
73 of
117)
5
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
54 of
73)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
115
Total Points Won
108
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Nikita Bilozertsev
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Cengiz Aksu
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
111)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
55 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Valentin Kopeikin
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Fatic vs Aksu?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Fatic Vs Aksu is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (371/271) | Win/Loss | 53% (158/138) |
| 57% (822/619) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (352/306) |
| 53% (7028/6255) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3133/2842) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1406 | Aces Total | 317 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1420 | Total Double Faults | 649 |
| 1:18:19 | Average Match Time | 1:6:17 |
| 223.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 135.59 |
| 67% (21734/32562) | 1st Serve % | 62% (7562/12101) |
| 65% (14165/21734) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (4777/7562) |
| 48% (5160/10828) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2148/4539) |
| 47% (1801/3830) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (577/1288) |
| 43% (14221/32832) | Return Points Win % | 42% (5113/12290) |
| 59% (362/616) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (153/290) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 51% (73/143) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (28/59) |
| 53% (93/177) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (30/71) |
| 88% (365/321) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (159/138) |
| 11% (365/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (159/21) |
| 18% (277/51) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (136/19) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
